Robertson v. Argus Hosiery Mills, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, District Judge.
This is a suit for back wages brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 206, 207. It is brought for the “plaintiff and all other employees of the Argus Hosiery Mills, Inc., who- are similarly situated, as is expressly author ized by sec. 16(b) of said Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938”. The defendant has moved to dismiss the action on the ground that the court lacks jurisdiction because the amount in controversy between plaintiff and defendant exclusive of interest and costs is less than $3,000.
The plaintiff has moved to strike the motion upon the idea,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bullard v. City of CiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Foster & Kleiser Co. v. Special Site Sign Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Hartford Fire Ins. v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Storm Lake Tub & Tank Factory v. Minneapolis & St. L. R.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1913
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Martin v. Lain Oil & Gas Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1941
- Booth v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
- Owens v. Greenville News-PiedmontDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1942
- Stewart v. HickmanDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1941
- Stringer v. Griffin Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.