Storm Lake Tub & Tank Factory v. Minneapolis & St. L. R.
District Court, N.D. Iowa
At Law. Action by the Storm Lake Tub & Tank Factory against the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Company. On motion to remand to state court.
1Opinion of the Court
REED, District Judge.
The plaintiff filed its petition against the defendant railroad company in the district court of Iowa, in and for Buena Vista county, July 28, 1913, in two counts, which are in effect the same, alleging in substance: That plaintiff is an Iowa corporation engaged in manufacturing butter tubs and tanks at Storm Lake, Iowa) that defendant is a railroad corporation engaged as_a common carrier *896of persons and property in the states of Iowa and Minnesota; that about March 1, 1913, the plaintiff delivered to the defendant at Storm Lake, and loaded into one of its cars at that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Peyton v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cudahy Packing Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1916
- Robertson v. Argus Hosiery Mills, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1940
- Elliott v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Norfolk Southern Railroad v. Norfolk Truckers' Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.