Legal Opinion

Martin v. Lain Oil & Gas Co.

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided January 10, 1941No. 354PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHAM, District Judge.

This is a suit by plaintiff for himself and others for whom he is an alleged agent to collect wages alleged to be due by defendant under the facts stated in the complaint, by virtue of the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S. C.A. § 201 et seq. The suit involves less than $3,000, and diversity of citizenship does not appear from the allegations of the complaint.

The jurisdictional allegation in the complaint is as follows: “Jurisdiction of this case is conferred upon this Court by Section 41(8) of Title 28 of the United States Code for the reason…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mulford v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Campbell v. Superior Decalcominia Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1940
  3. Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Administrator of Wage & Hour Division of Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  4. Gorman v. A. B. Leach & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1926
  5. Fishman v. MarcouseDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Myers v. American Dental Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. Jerry Wayne Davis v. Hill Engineering, Inc. And Williams-Mcwilliams Co., Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Blank v. BitkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  4. Phillips v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  5. Gross v. FranklinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API