Legal Opinion

In Re Eckberg

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2000No. 88589PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW

The Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) filed a petition with the Hearing Board, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 758 (137 Ill. 2d R. 758), seeking a determination whether respondent, David Eugene Eckberg, was incapacitated from continuing to practice law by reason of a mental infirmity or a mental disorder and should be transferred to inactive status. The Hearing Board determined that although respondent had been incapacitated from continuing to practice law at the time the Administrator filed the petition, respondent was not incapacitated at the time…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Calloway v. KinkelaarIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Re ImmingIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In Re SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re TimponeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re SpakIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re StormentIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re TimponeIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re GoreckiIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In Re EckbergIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re KruleIllinois Supreme Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API