Legal Opinion

In Re Imming

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1989No. 67738PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos

On January 24, 1986, the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission filed a four-count complaint charging attorney-respondent Richard Cornell Imming with engaging in prohibited business transactions with clients, accepting employment when his professional judgment may be affected by his own interests, engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, causing prejudice or damage to his clients and overreaching in his attorney-client relationships in violation of several provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility (the Code) (107 Ill. 2d R.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In Re SaladinoIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. McFail v. BradenIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  4. In Re HimmelIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re WigodaIllinois Supreme Court · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Walter P. Maksym, Jr. v. Dolores LoeschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Horwitz v. Holabird & RootIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Skolnick v. Altheimer & GrayIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re Marriage of PaganoIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API