Legal Opinion

In Re Eckberg

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2000No. 88589Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

733 N.E.2d 1244 (2000)

192 Ill.2d 70

248 Ill.Dec. 246

In re David Eugene ECKBERG, Attorney, Respondent.

No. 88589.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

July 6, 2000.

Susan Frederick Rhodes, of Chicago, for the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.

Carl M. Walsh, of Chicago, for respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · McMORROWJustice McMORROW

The Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) filed a petition with the Hearing Board, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 758 (137 Ill.2d R. 758), seeking a determination whether respondent, David Eugene Eckberg, was incapacitated from continuing to practice…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Calloway v. KinkelaarIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Re ImmingIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In Re SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re TimponeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re SpakIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API