In Re Eckberg
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court 1
733 N.E.2d 1244 (2000)
192 Ill.2d 70
248 Ill.Dec. 246
In re David Eugene ECKBERG, Attorney, Respondent.
No. 88589.
Supreme Court of Illinois.
July 6, 2000.
Susan Frederick Rhodes, of Chicago, for the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.
Carl M. Walsh, of Chicago, for respondent.
2Opinion of the Court · McMORROWJustice McMORROW
The Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) filed a petition with the Hearing Board, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 758 (137 Ill.2d R. 758), seeking a determination whether respondent, David Eugene Eckberg, was incapacitated from continuing to practice…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Calloway v. KinkelaarIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re ImmingIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re TimponeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re SpakIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.