Legal Opinion

In Re Spak

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1999No. 87237PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

The Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission filed a complaint with the Hearing Board charging respondent, Linda Lee Spak, with conversion, failure to reduce a contingent fee agreement to writing in violation of Rule 1.5(c) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, failure to notify a third person upon receiving funds in which the third person has an interest in violation of Rule 1.15(b), knowingly making a false statement of material fact or law to a third person in the course of representing a client in violation of Rule 4.1(a), conduct involving…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re ClayterIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re HopperIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re RinellaIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re LenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In Re UshijimaIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Marquis & Aurbach v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In Re StormentIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Robert Matthew BristolNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Guerrant v. RothAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. In Re WinthropIllinois Supreme Court · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API