Farmers' State Guaranty Bank v. Cromwell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Custer County; Thos. A. Edwards, Judge. Action by the Farmers’ State Guaranty Bank against C. E. Cromwell. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
GALBRAITH, C.
The plaintiff in error, as plaintiff in the trial court, commenced an action against the defendant in error, as defendant, to recover ion a (promissory note for $1,360, with interest from August 9, 1914, and attorney’s fee of $100.
The answer was a general denial, and the affirmative defense of failure of consideration and fraud and deceit on behalf of the plaintiff, in this, that the note represented the purchase price of eight shares of the capital stock of the plaintiff hank, which the defendant purchased from a third party by the name of Ross, but, before…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. City Bank of ColumbusSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Commercial National Bank v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- Lamon v. Speer Hardware Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Cargile v. Union State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bingham v. National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- De Swarte v. First National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Walcott v. HardisterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Clark v. DeitrickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1939