Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Walcott v. Hardister

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 29, 1924No. 15045PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

Suit was filed by the State Bank Commissioner against E. L. Hardister to enforce the statutory stockholders’ liability against him as a stockholder in the insolvent Bartlesville 'State Bank. At the -time the bank was taken over by the Bank Commissioner, the defendant appeared on the books of the corporation as the owner of 25 shares of stock, of the par value of $106 eacii.

The defendant filed an answer and cross-petition, in which it was alleged that the stock which stood in the defendant’s name on tne books of the corporation was a part of a fictitious increase of capital stock of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Scott v. DeweeseSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Turnbull v. PaysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. American Tube Works v. Boston Machine Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Bentley v. Zelma Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Scott v. LatimerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Weede v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Garnett v. State Ex Rel. Bank CommissionerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Porter v. State Ex Rel. Mothersead, Bank Com'r.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Collier v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. State Ex Rel. Walcott v. ZollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API