Cargile v. Union State Bank
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Muskogee County; Farrar L. McCain, Judge. Action by the Union State Bank against J. T. Cargile;'J. W. McRea, and the Mid-Continent Life Insurance Company. From the judgment, J. T. Cargile brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was an action upon a promissory note, commenced by the defendant in error, Union State Bank, against the plaintiff in error, J. T. Cargile, as principal, and J. W. Mc-Rea and Mid-Continent Life Insurance Company, as endorsers. Service of summons was had upon all the defendants. Cargile filed an answer and cross-petition wherein he admitted the execution of the note sued upon, but denied liability for its payment as against the insurance company and alleged that he is entitled to have canceled and returned to him' another promissory note for the sum of $3,000, executed at the same time…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hutson v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Craft v. South Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Rayfield v. Van MeterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Keefe v. FairfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Carroll v. TuckerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Eastwood v. ClinkscalesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Newbern v. FarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. GrimSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Smith v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.