Legal Opinion

Bingham v. National Bank

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1937No. 7,620PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion:

2Per curiam

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for interfering with her possession of certain real property situated in Meagher county. The action was brought against the defendant bank, Thomas A. Marlow, Richard Manger, Clara Manger, his wife, Russell Manger, and Manger Ranches, a copartnership. At the close of all the evidence a motion for directed verdict in behalf of Russell Manger and Thomas A. Marlow was granted. The cause was submitted to the jury as to the other defendants. The jury found in favor of all the other defendants save the bank. It found for plaintiff as against…

3Cases cited69 opinions

  1. American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Putnam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Eten v. . LuysterNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. First Nat. Bank v. . Ocean Nat. BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by18 opinions

  1. Emery v. EmeryMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Lewis v. LewisMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Detra v. BartolettiMontana Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Baird v. BairdMontana Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Kranjcec v. BelinakMontana Supreme Court · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API