Legal Opinion

Kwolek v. Swickard

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 2011No. 64A05-1006-PL-372PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Jerry and Mary Kwolek appeal the trial court’s declaratory judgment in favor of Rodney and Jennifer Swickard. The trial court held that the Swickards have the right to park within an ingress-egress easement in a gravel area thirty-six feet ■wide by twenty-two and one-half feet deep in the front of their garage (the “disputed area”). We address the following three issues on appeal:

1. Whether the trial court correctly interpreted an ingress-egress easement to include a right to park within the easement;

2. Whether improvements the Kwoleks made to the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McCauley v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Huntington v. RiggsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. New York Central Railroad v. YarianIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Miller v. GeelsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Andrews v. City of MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Howard v. United StatesIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Earl F. Shields, Larry J. Shields, and Robert L. Shields v. Rodney L. TaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Celebration Worship Center, Inc. v. Patrick Tucker and Carolyn P. Tucker, A/K/A Patty TuckerIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. County of Lake and the Lake County Plan Commission v. Alan J. Pahl and Roderick PahlIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Rehl v. BilletzIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API