Legal Opinion
Homer v. Burman
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 9, 2001No. 27A02-0009-CV-568PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Dave and Annette Homer ("the Homers") appeal the trial court's negative judgment in favor of J.M. Burman d/b/a Burman Electric Service ("Burman Electric").
We reverse and remand.
ISSUE
Whether the trial court's judgment is contrary to law.
FACTS
During the month of August 1999, the Homers hired Burman Electric to perform electrical work on their rental property located at 432 North Boots in Marion. Burman was initially hired to install an electric box at the rear of the house. However, after Stephanie Clevenger ("Cle-venger"), the Homers' tenant, complained…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Insul-Mark Midwest, Inc. v. Modern Materials, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Wagner Const. Co., Inc. v. NoonanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hagerman Construction, Inc. v. CopelandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Miller v. GeelsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Mullis v. BrennanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- INS Investigations Bureau, Inc. v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- DiMizio v. RomoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Krieg v. HieberIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- DeGroff v. Mascotech Forming Technologies-Fort Wayne, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2001
- Benge v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.