Legal Opinion

Pinnacle Properties v. Saulka

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1998No. 53A01-9709-CV-317PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARRARD, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Pinnacle Properties (“Pinnacle”) appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Clayton Saulka and Nathan Rabideau (the “Tenants”). The Tenants brought their small claims action against their former landlord, Pinnacle, after Pinnacle retained the Tenants’ entire security deposit following the termination of their occupancy in property owned by Pinnacle. The Tenants sought return of their $2,500.00 security deposit, court costs, and attorney’s fees. After a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment in favor of the Tenants.

We affirm in part,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. GeelsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Duchon v. RossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Beeson v. ChristianIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Meyers v. LangleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Kleine-Albrandt v. LambIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Elyse De Stefano v. Apts. Downtown, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. Lae v. HouseholderIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Robinson v. GazvodaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Schoknecht v. HasemeierIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Hill v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API