Legal Opinion

Locken v. Locken

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1982No. 12315PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case focuses upon a dispute between a father and son over the ownership of land. In satisfaction of certain indebtedness owed to the respondent father by a third party, the father agreed to accept an assignment of two patent applications for separate parcels of land. Since the Desert Land Act, 43 U.S.C. § 321 (1964), prohibited the father from making more than one entry in his own name, at the suggestion of his son, the parties verbally agreed to place one of the applications in the son’s name. Under this agreement, the father was to make certain improvements upon the land, and…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Loughran v. LoughranSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Magill v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Xerox Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  4. Schmidt v. MerriweatherNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Davidson v. StreeterNevada Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by28 opinions

  1. Shuette v. Beazer Homes Holdings Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Bemis v. Estate of BemisNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Rowland v. LepireNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Waldman v. MainiNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. KB HomeDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API