Legal Opinion
DiMuro v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 31, 1984No. 1 CA-IC 3054PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYERSON, Judge.
I. FACTS
This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission (Commission) award dismissing a death benefits claim filed by the wife (petitioner) of the deceased employee. The administrative law judge (judge) dismissed the claim because he concluded that the deceased employee (DiMuro) was not “regularly employed” in Arizona under A.R.S. § 23-904.A. (§ 23-904.A.). For the reasons stated herein we affirm the award.
DiMuro was hired in a state other than Arizona and employed as a professional baseball umpire by the American League of Professional Baseball Clubs…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Collins v. American Buslines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Stapleton v. Travelers Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.California Supreme Court · 2011
- Donahue v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Arizona Southern Coach Lines, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Mendes's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2020