Legal Opinion

Arizona Southern Coach Lines, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 5, 1988No. 1 CA-IC 3711Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Judge.

The petitioner employer (ASCL), acting in the name of the respondent employee (Potter), alleged before the Arizona Industrial Commission that the respondent carrier (Fund) had improperly discontinued compensation payments to Potter. ASCL requested that the Commission investigate pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-1061(J), which provides in relevant part:

The commission shall investigate and review any claim in which it appears to the commission that the claimant has not been granted the benefits to which such claimant is entitled. If the commission determines that payment or denial of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Evertsen v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Evertsen v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. DiMuro v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API