Legal Opinion

Donahue v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1993No. 1 CA-IC 92-0044PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Presiding Judge.

The issue presented in this review of an Industrial Commission decision is whether an employer is subject to the Workers’ Compensation Act when, although it is unusual for him to employ any workers, he hires a temporary employee for a task in the employer’s usual trade. Coverage in this situation is governed by Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 23-902(A), which provides in part:

*175Employers subject to the provisions of this chapter are ... every person who has in his employ any workmen or operatives regularly employed in the same business or establishment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Devenir Associates v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. ARIZONA NEWSPAPERS ASS'N. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Marshall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Mathers v. SellersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Putz v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. Meno's construction/aig v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  3. Molinares v. City HeightsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API