Legal Opinion
State v. Martin
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided February 20, 2009No. 20070426-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THORNE, Associate Presiding Judge:
11 Michael C. Martin appeals from his conviction of one count of eriminal mischief, a class A misdemeanor, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-106 (2008). We dismiss Martin's appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
BACKGROUND
12 In November 2004, the State charged Martin. with two counts of criminal mischief arising out of an easement dispute between Martin and a neighbor, Kathryn Randazzo. The State's information, which charged Martin with one second degree felony count (count one) and one third degree felony count (count two), alleged that Martin tore down a fence and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Varian-Eimac, Inc. v. LamoreauxCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- State v. GerrardUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- A.J. MacKay Co. v. Okland Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Manning v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BowersUtah Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. NewcombCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Pearson v. South Jordan Employee Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
- State v. NewcombCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Pearson v. South Jordan Employee Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009