Legal Opinion

Pearson v. South Jordan Employee Appeals Board

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 30, 2009No. Case No. 20070378-CAPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McHUGH, Judge:

¶ 1 Daniel Pearson seeks review of the South Jordan City Employee Appeals Board’s (the Board) decision that his employment as South Jordan City’s assistant police chief was at will. We dismiss his appeal because we lack subject matter jurisdiction.

BACKGROUND

¶2 Pearson was hired as the Assistant Police Chief for South Jordan City (the City) in July 2002. On January 30, 2007, City Manager Ricky Horst notified Pearson that he was being terminated from that position. The written notice of termination stated that Pearson’s employment was at will, meaning he could be discharged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Varian-Eimac, Inc. v. LamoreauxCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. Houghton v. Department of HealthUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Garcia v. FreeUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  4. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Thorpe v. Washington CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  2. Becker v. Sunset CityUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Fierro v. Park City Municipal Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  4. Taylorsville City v. Taylorsville City Employee Appeal BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  5. McClellan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API