Legal Opinion

State v. Newcomb

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 17, 2011No. 40056-1-IIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*187fl The State appeals the trial court’s order granting Scott Newcomb’s pretrial motion to dismiss a charge of first degree malicious mischief. We reverse and remand.

Williams, J.*

Facts

¶2 Newcomb’s mother owns land subject to a roadway easement that provides the sole means of access to Tim Kredlo’s neighboring property. Kredlo bought his property from Peter Stone, Amy Stone, and Ricki Bayne in late 2005.

¶3 In 2004, the Stones and Bayne sued Newcomb and his mother over the Stones’ right to use the easement and Newcomb’s alleged interference with that right. The trial court found that Newcomb’s…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. KnapstadWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kiely v. GravesWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Admasu v. Port of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. State v. MoncadaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API