Legal Opinion

Pearson v. South Jordan Employee Appeals Board

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 30, 2009No. Case No. 20070378-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

2009 UT App 204

Daniel Pearson, Petitioner,

v.

South Jordan Employee Appeals Board and South Jordan City, Respondents.

Case No. 20070378-CA.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

Filed July 30, 2009.

Gregory G. Skordas and Chad D. Noakes, Salt Lake City, for Petitioner.

Camille N. Johnson and Judith D. Wolferts, Salt Lake City, for Respondents.

Before Judges Thorne, Davis, and McHugh.

OPINION

McHUGH, Judge:

¶ 1 Daniel Pearson seeks review of the South Jordan City Employee Appeals Board's (the Board) decision that his employment as South Jordan City's assistant police chief was at will. We dismiss his appeal because…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Varian-Eimac, Inc. v. LamoreauxCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. Canfield v. Layton CityUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Houghton v. Department of HealthUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Garcia v. FreeUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Pearson v. South Jordan Employee Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API