Legal Opinion

Schloss Bros. & Co. v. Bennett

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1932PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pound, Ch. J.

Plaintiff, a corporation, sues defendants, copartners, for a balance due on the purchase price of goods, wares and merchandise. The answer alleges a novation whereby the plaintiff accepted R. W. Bennett & Co., Inc., a New York corporation, as its debtor in place of the partnership and released defendants from any liability for the cause of action sued on. Plaintiff’s claim was originally against the partnership. Plaintiff continued for a time to do business with the corporation without discharging the partnership from its indebtedness.

The following facts appear: When the Bennett…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colgrove v. . TallmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Millerd v. . ThornNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Harrington-Wiard Co. v. Blomstrom Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Tuscaloosa Lumber Co. v. Tropical Paint & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Ayer v. KilmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Codman v. BeaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. VJK Productions, Inc. v. Friedman/Meyer Productions, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  3. Blair & Co. v. Otto V.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  4. C. T. Fuller and Louisiana Stud, Inc. v. Fasig-Tipton Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. Healy v. BrotmanNew York Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API