Legal Opinion

Tuscaloosa Lumber Co. v. Tropical Paint & Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 10, 1924No. 6 Div. 912PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The action is in assumpsit. Defendant pleaded in short by consent — the general issue, payment, accord, satisfaction, novation. The trial, had before the court without a jury and on documentary evidence and testimony given ore tenus resulted in judgment for the plaintiff.' Motion to have the judgment set aside and a new trial granted was overruled. '

If the defendant repudiated the contract of sale yet it received, used, or sold the goods of the invoice price and unless there was a novation or payment of the debt, it is liable therefor in assumpsit. Privity o(f contract is not- necessary to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McDonnell v. Alabama Gold Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Allen v. M. Mendelsohn & SonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. v. Shut & KeihnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Barnes v. Hekla Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. McWilliams v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. City Nat. Bank of Huron, SD v. FullerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Cooper Grocery Co. v. StrangeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. Schloss Bros. & Co. v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Thomas v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API