Legal Opinion

Millerd v. . Thorn

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1874PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The party holding the affirmative upon an issue of fact has the right, upon trial, to open and close the proof, and to reply in summing up the case to the jury. This is a legal right not resting in the discretion of the court, and when denied the denial may be excepted to and the ruling reviewed upon appeal from the judgment. (Lindsley v. The European Petroleum Co., 3 Lansing, 176; Elwell v. Chamberlin, 31 N.Y., 614.)

The defendant in this case held the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Waydell v. LuerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1846

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Calvo v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Colgrove v. . TallmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Smith v. SheldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. De Vito v. KatschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Murray v. . New York Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API