Legal Opinion

American China Development Co. v. Boyd

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 11, 1906No. 13,682PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

This was an action brought by the plaintiff in the consular court of Shanghai, China, to recover from the defendant the sum of $21,000 for breach of contract. The cause of action stated in the petition is as follows:

“W. Porter Boyd, Plaintiff, vs. American China Development Co., Defendant Petition.
“Canton-Hankow Railway.
“To Honorable John Goodnow, Consul General, Acting Judicially: The petition of the above-named plaintiff shows:
“(1) That he is a citizen of the United States of America now residing at Shanghai, China, and within the jurisdiction of this honorable court.
“(…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Benjamin v. HillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  5. Rhoades v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Bakelite Corp'n.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. American Trading Co. v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  3. China Press, Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  4. Yangtsze Rapid S. S. Co. v. Deutsch-Asiatische BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  5. Reed v. WeuleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API