Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 20, 1899No. 174PublishedCited by 139 opinions

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. This was an action, brought January 22, 1892, in the circuit court of Jefferson County in the State of .Alabama, by .Frank H. Pierce, a citizen of the State of Alabama, against the Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad Company, a corporation of the State of Tennessee, doing business in'the State of Alabama, upon a written contract, signed by the parties, and in the following terms: “ Pratt Mines, Ala. 4th June,…

Read the full summary

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. This was an action, brought January 22, 1892, in the circuit court of Jefferson County in the State of .Alabama, by .Frank H. Pierce, a citizen of the State of Alabama, against the Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad Company, a corporation of the State of Tennessee, doing business in'the State of Alabama, upon a written contract, signed by the parties, and in the following terms: “ Pratt Mines, Ala. 4th June, 1890. Whereas I, F. H. Pierce, while in the employ of the Tennessee Iron, Coal and Railroad Company, Pratt Mines Division,…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

In the Circuit Court of the United States, a verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff for - a less amount of damages than he claimed; and each.party alleged exceptions to.rulings and instructions of the judge, and sued out a writ of error from the' Circuit Court of Appeals. That court, héld that the defendant’s demurrer to the complaint should have been sustained, and therefore reversed the judgment of the Circuit Court, and remanded the case for further proceedings. A writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals was thereupon applied for by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Gardner v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Dingley v. OlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Carnig v. CarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Daniels v. NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Dunbar v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. New York Life Insurance v. ViglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API