Legal Opinion
Yangtsze Rapid S. S. Co. v. Deutsch-Asiatische Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 16, 1932No. 6637PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Court for China.
The pertinent facts, as embodied in the narrative “Findings of Fact” of the court below, are substantially as follows:
On or about July 6, 1928, at Shanghai, China, appellant, the Yangtsze Rapid Steamship Company, entered into a contract in writing with one A. C. Seidel, whereby the latter as “seller” undertook to design, construct, and build for the appellant as the “buyer” one twin screw Diesel motorship in. accordance with the specifications attached to said contract for the sum of TIs.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hard & Rand, Inc. v. Biston Coffee Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Tingley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- McCloskey v. Pacific Coast Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Stoffregen v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Metzler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Howell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Stoody Co. v. Mills Alloys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Davies v. LahannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Mutual Lumber Co. v. PoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.