Diederichsen v. Sutch
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
The facts, so far as material to this appeal, are as follows: John Sutch and Rosa Sutch, defendants and appellants, are the owners of a lot in tract 4948 in Alhambra. This lot, purchased January 26, 1934, faces on a public street known as Waverly Drive. The rear of the lot abuts upon a public alley. The property across the alley is classified as business property. At the time appellants purchased the lot it was improved with a dwelling house that cost $4,250. Respondents notified appellants that they were violating the restrictions in their deed when in July, 1937, they commenced the erection…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Downs v. KroegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Marysville Woolen Mills v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Bernard v. WeaberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Bryant v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fairchild v. RainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Morgan v. VeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
- Cal-Dak Co. v. Sav-On Drugs, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
- American Fruit Growers v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.