Legal Opinion

Diederichsen v. Sutch

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 1941No. Civ. 2743PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

The facts, so far as material to this appeal, are as follows: John Sutch and Rosa Sutch, defendants and appellants, are the owners of a lot in tract 4948 in Alhambra. This lot, purchased January 26, 1934, faces on a public street known as Waverly Drive. The rear of the lot abuts upon a public alley. The property across the alley is classified as business property. At the time appellants purchased the lot it was improved with a dwelling house that cost $4,250. Respondents notified appellants that they were violating the restrictions in their deed when in July, 1937, they commenced the erection…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Downs v. KroegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Marysville Woolen Mills v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Bernard v. WeaberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Bryant v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fairchild v. RainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Morgan v. VeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Cal-Dak Co. v. Sav-On Drugs, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
  5. American Fruit Growers v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API