Legal Opinion

Bernard v. Weaber

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1913No. Civ. No. 1433PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEALS from a judgment of dismissal of the Superior Court of Kern County and from orders refusing to issue a preliminary injunction and dissolving a restraining order. J. W. Mahon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action to enjoin the issuance of street improvement bonds. As shown by the complaint, filed June 7, 1912, the board of trustees of the city of Bakersfield did, on July 10, 1911, adopt a resolution of intention to order the improvement of certain streets in said city according to plans and specifications prepared therefor, and wherein it declared the expense of the improvements should be chargeable upon the lots and lands within a district designated as “Street District No. 1,” the exterior boundaries of which were described therein. It was also declared in said resolution that the board of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Foster v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. In Re Peremptory Mandamus to ManningNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Bradley v. VoorsangerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Wright v. Bd. of Pub . Works of L.A.California Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Ball v. KehlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Finnie v. Town of TiburonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. City of Plymouth v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Diederichsen v. SutchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Thompson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Boggs v. North American Bond & Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API