Marysville Woolen Mills v. Smith
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Evan J. Hughes, W. E. Davies, and Downey, Pullen & Downey, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
Two other eases on appeal—California Midland Ry. Co. v. Smith, and Martin v. Smith, post, p. 812, [175 Pac. 16]—involve the same controlling points as are embraced in this appeal, and by stipulation of all parties are submitted to abide the decision on the appeal under present" consideration.
This action was brought to remove a cloud upon the title of the plaintiff to certain property in Tuba County through the issuance of a certificate of sale to defendant Johnson at a> delinquent tax sale and to enjoin the issuance of a tax deed on the certificate.
The court entered a decree declaring the tax…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Tilton v. RussekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Metteer v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- California Midland Railway Co. v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Oakland v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Reid & Sibell Inc. v. Gilmore & Edwards Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Pacific Finance Corp. v. City of LynwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- District Bond Co. v. PollackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Diederichsen v. SutchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.