Dimmick v. Alvarez
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.
Plaintiffs, Floyd Dimmick and his wife, Lillian, appeal from a judgment in their favor entered on a jury verdict, in their actions for property damage and personal injuries, and from the denial of their motion for a new trial. They contend that a new trial on the issue of damages should be granted to plaintiff, Lillian Dimmick, as the damages awarded are inadequate as a matter of law, and that both plaintiffs are entitled to a new trial because of conversation which occurred during the trial between defense counsel and members of the jury.
Turning first to the purported appeal from the order…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Gersick v. ShillingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Taylor v. PoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Gimbel v. LaramieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Reeves v. ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. HoneycuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Morris v. McCauley's Quality Transmission ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- McAllister v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Miller v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Ward v. LitowskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.