Legal Opinion

Howard v. Mortensen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1927No. 20405. Department TwoPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff Howard seeks recovery of eight head of cattle from the defendants, Mortensen and Ellington, or, in the alternative, their value as damages which he alleges to he $250. Howard heretofore claimed ownership in the cattle, his present claim, however, being his alleged right to the possession of the cattle to the end that he might thereby be enabled to turn them over to the sheriff, in compliance with his present legal obligation, and thereby avoid damages which he will suffer upon his failure so to do. Morten-sen was appointed receiver of the cattle, at the instance of Ellington, in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Russell v. . WinneNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Douthitt v. MacCulskyWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Shoemake v. FinlaysonWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Perry v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Saar v. WeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bacon v. GardnerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Hackler v. HacklerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. Desimone v. SpenceWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  5. Woodruff v. CoateWashington Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API