Desimone v. Spence
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
We affirm the dismissal of this quiet-title action brought by execution purchasers of real property to perfect their title to property so purchased because they acquired only the interest of the judgment debtor, whose rights in this instance had been forfeited in the February preceding the execution sales in November.
Appellants, plaintiffs below, sued respondent, defendant below, to quiet the title to real property in question. The complaint averred that the respondent was in possession claiming title and the appellants were the execution purchasers of the property.
The respondent’s title was…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bacon v. GardnerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Shoemake v. FinlaysonWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Lewis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Ransom v. Wickstrom & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Eckley v. Bonded Adjustment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bavand v. OneWest Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Northern Commercial Co. v. E. J. Hermann Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- Northlake Marine Works, Inc. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Sander v. WellsWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Kim v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.