Legal Opinion

Douthitt v. MacCulsky

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1895No. 1532PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

Respondents have filed a motion in this court to strike the statement of facts from the *602record because a copy of the statement served on counsel for respondents did not contain any of the exhibits or written evidence introduced upon the trial, but thereafter the same were, over the objections of the respondents, attached to the original statement and certified by the court.

Sec. 10 of ch. 60, Laws of 1893, p. 115, relating to the settling and certifying of statements of facts, provides :

“ Depositions and other written evidence on file shall be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  3. Anderson v. WattSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Albert v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  5. Parr v. State ex rel. CockeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. PughWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. PughWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Estate of Dougherty v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Shoemake v. FinlaysonWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Schroeder v. Hotel Commercial Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API