Saar v. Weeks
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered February 23, 1918, dismissing an action to quiet title, on plaintiffs’ default in failing to answer interrogatories.
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
The appellants, as plaintiffs below, on November 19, 1910, filed their complaint in an action *629to quiet title to certain real estate, in King county, Washington. The complaint was in the usual form, alleging ownership, the right of possession, that the land was vacant and unoccupied, and that the defendants, respondents here, made an adverse claim of ownership which constituted a cloud upon plaintiffs’ title. They prayed for a judgment establishing their title in fee simple, adjudging that defendants had no right or interest therein, and prayed for costs and general relief. After demurring…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Larmon v. KnightIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Smalley v. LaugenourWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Lawson v. Black Diamond Coal Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
- Rollins v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Gates v. KelleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ryan v. PlathWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Bohannon v. TrotmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Hesthagen v. HarbyWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Bohannon v. . TrotmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Hayes Oyster Co. v. Keypoint Oyster Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.