San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. McKeegan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
This appeal by the lessees (Arnold and Vida L. Santueei) from a conditional order granting a new trial to the lessors (McKeegan, Henry and McKell) after a jury trial to apportion a condemnation award in the stipulated amount of $150,000, presents a question of first impression under the 1965 amendments to section 657 of the Code of Civil Procedure as construed in Mercer v. Perez, 68 Cal.2d 104 [65 Cal.Rptr. 315, 436 P.2d 315], and Treber v. Superior Court, 68 Cal.2d 128 [65 Cal.Rptr. 330, 436 P.2d 330].
A chronology of the pertinent events is necessary for an understanding and discussion of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Malkasian v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Jehl v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Treber v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Meiner v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Musgrove v. Ambrose PropertiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- New Haven Unified School District v. Taco Bell Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- People Ex Rel. Department of Water Resources v. AndresenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.