Legal Opinion

San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. McKeegan

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 1968No. Civ. 24323PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This appeal by the lessees (Arnold and Vida L. Santueei) from a conditional order granting a new trial to the lessors (McKeegan, Henry and McKell) after a jury trial to apportion a condemnation award in the stipulated amount of $150,000, presents a question of first impression under the 1965 amendments to section 657 of the Code of Civil Procedure as construed in Mercer v. Perez, 68 Cal.2d 104 [65 Cal.Rptr. 315, 436 P.2d 315], and Treber v. Superior Court, 68 Cal.2d 128 [65 Cal.Rptr. 330, 436 P.2d 330].

A chronology of the pertinent events is necessary for an understanding and discussion of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Malkasian v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Jehl v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Treber v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Meiner v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Musgrove v. Ambrose PropertiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. New Haven Unified School District v. Taco Bell Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Water Resources v. AndresenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API