Legal Opinion
Rosenfield v. Vosper
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 9, 1948No. Civ. 16094PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCOMB, J. Assigned.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in his favor awarding him $1,000 as compensation in an action to recover attorney’s fees of the alleged value of $18,000. The case was tried before the court without a jury.
History of the Litigation
The action was commenced by plaintiff March 7, 1939, to recover from defendants the sum of $18,000 allegedly due for attorney’s fees. After a trial before the court without a jury, a judgment was entered for plaintiff in the sum of $12,567.32. On appeal this judgment was reversed and a new trial ordered. (Rosenfield v. Vosper, 45 Cal.App.2d 365…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- American National Bank v. DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- McEwen v. Occidental Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Rosenfield v. VosperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bates v. NewmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Mershon Company v. Frank A. Pachmayr, and Frank A. Pachmayr, Doing Business Under the Fictitious Firm Name and Style of Pachmayr Gun WorksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Gardner v. Mobil Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Mershon Co. v. PachmayrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Smith v. Arthur D. Little, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.