Legal Opinion

Bates v. Newman

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1953No. Civ. 19681PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff as a result of the alleged negligence of an osteopathic physician and surgeon in the performance of a circumcision upon plaintiff, and in his care and treatment. The case was tried before the court and jury resulting in a verdict for defendant. There is an appeal from the judgment and a purported appeal from the order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

Facts: Plaintiff, a large man 37 years of age, was first married in 1940, and to his present wife in 1948. During his married life he had enjoyed normal,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Kalmus v. KalmusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Lawrence v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. MacPherson v. West Coast Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Tice v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. GuzmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. LoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Gist v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Stoddard v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API