Legal Opinion

Smith v. Arthur D. Little, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1969No. Civ. 32985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

and cross-defendant Chemold Company (hereinafter Sublessor), a California corporation, appeal from a judgment, rendered in a nonjury trial, declaring in effect that defendant and cross-complainant Arthur D. Little, Inc. (hereinafter Sublessee), a Massachusetts corporation, 1 was entitled to cancel and did cancel its sublease, effective June 30, 1964, in consideration of its forfeiting its $6,000 deposit held by Sub-lessor and-further adjudging that on its counterclaim Sub-lessee recover from Smith the sum of $6,600 overpayments of rent made'under mistake, together with $1,241.32 interest and…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. United States Leasing Corp. v. duPontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. McCarthy v. TallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. International Business Machines v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Robinson & Wilson, Inc. v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Salyer Grain & Milling Co. v. HensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Upland Industries Corp. v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API