Legal Opinion

Lindberg v. Pantoleon

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1929No. Docket No. 5897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, J., pro tem.

In this action instituted by plaintiff, guardian ad litem, of Robert Lindberg, a minor, to recover damages for personal injuries, a verdict was returned in his favor against defendants for $500. Judgment followed, and defendants appealed. The defendants were engaged in the retail grocery business, and in connection therewith operated a delivery truck. On the morning of October 6, 1923, defendant Antonio Pantoleon drove out in the truck to solicit business. In front of the residence of one of his customers he parked the ear with its back facing the sidewalk, and started to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  2. Silveira v. IversonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Nittler v. Continental Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. National Union Fire Insurance v. NasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. McLain v. Llewellyn Iron WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ades v. BrushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API