Legal Opinion

McLain v. Llewellyn Iron Works

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 6, 1922No. Civ. No. 3731PublishedCited by 16 opinions

,The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The sole question involved herein is the sufficiency of the complaint, to which the court overruled a general demurrer interposed by defendant. No answer was filed within the time allowed therefor; whereupon judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff, from which defendant has appealed.

It appears from the amended complaint that at all the times mentioned therein the defendant was a corporation owning and operating certain machinery for the construction and manufacture of structural iron and divers other steel and iron products; that on August 24, 1917, plaintiff was the mother of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barker v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  2. Dominguez v. PendolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Rhoda v. Alameda Cty.California Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Dye v. DyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Cockrill v. ClymaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brooks v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Lester v. IsaacCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. MacBeth v. MacBethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Hunt, Mirk & Company v. Hesperides Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API