Legal Opinion

Lucke v. Coe

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 5, 1934No. 5663PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

After the filing of the original opinion in this ease, a rehearing was granted upon the application of the Commissioner of Patents.

The appeal is from a decree dismissing appellants’ bill filed under the provisions of section 4915, Rev. St., as amended (section 63, tit. 35, U. S. C. [35 USCA § 63]), which provides that: “whenever a patent on application is refused by the Commissioner of Patents, the applicant, unless appeal has been taken from the decision of the board of appeals to the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, and such appeal is pending or has…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Merrill v. YeomansSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Red River Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Gold Seal Co. v. Weeks, Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  3. Gold Seal Company v. WeeksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1955
  4. Knutson v. GallsworthyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  5. Gilbert v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API