Legal Opinion

Harp v. Pease

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1921No. Civ. No. 3272PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The action is in assumpsit for $597.76 for money had and received. Defendant, by way of counterclaim, alleges a contract of employment of himself by plaintiff and a breach of the contract in that the services rendered had not been paid for. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for the sum of $354.50. Defendant moved for a new trial on all of the statutory grounds. The court set aside the verdict of the jury and granted the motion for a new trial. The order indicates that among other grounds, it is based upon “excessive damages appearing to have been given under the influence of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Ingraham v. WeidlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Anglo-Nevada Assurance Corp. v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lovett v. DintzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API