Harp v. Pease
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
The action is in assumpsit for $597.76 for money had and received. Defendant, by way of counterclaim, alleges a contract of employment of himself by plaintiff and a breach of the contract in that the services rendered had not been paid for. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for the sum of $354.50. Defendant moved for a new trial on all of the statutory grounds. The court set aside the verdict of the jury and granted the motion for a new trial. The order indicates that among other grounds, it is based upon “excessive damages appearing to have been given under the influence of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Ingraham v. WeidlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Anglo-Nevada Assurance Corp. v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lovett v. DintzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955