Legal Opinion

Lovett v. Dintzer

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 1955No. Civ. 20513PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From an order granting a motion for a new trial in an action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from the alleged negligence of defendant, plaintiff appeals.

Facts: Defendant was the owner of a building known as the Senate Hotel, in which one of the apartments was leased to plaintiff. On February 7, 1953, having occasion to leave the hotel, plaintiff went out the rear exit and as he opened the screen door onto the porch he heard a noise and looked up and saw bricks falling. He lost his balance and tried to move out of the way but fell over a railing to the ground 15 feet below…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Lahti v. McMenaminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Gray v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Scott v. RenzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. FontaineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. MascottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Van Ostrum v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Legg v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident of OhamaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API