Legal Opinion
Takach v. American Medical Technology, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 19, 1998No. 72247PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
James D. Sweeney, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Jacqueline Takach (“Takach”), born February 12, 1952, appeals from the granting of summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees-movants American Medical Technology, Inc. (“AMT”), George J. Picha, M.D. (“Dr. Picha”), and Western Reserve Plastic Surgery, Inc. (“Plastic”). 1 For the reasons adduced below, we affirm.
A review of the record on appeal indicates that the action involves claims for sexual harassment, wrongful discharge from employment, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
In both 1972 and 1982, Takach underwent breast…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jersey v. John Muir Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Steppe v. Kmart StoresOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Vass v. Riester & Thesmacher Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
- Taylor v. Volunteers of AmericaOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Noble v. Brinker International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.