Legal Opinion
Noble v. Brinker International, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided December 12, 2001No. C2-00-663PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
MARBLEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed on July 27, 2001. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion -for Summary Judgment in part and GRANTS the Motion in part.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a race discrimination case brought by Plaintiff Marcus Noble (“Noble”) against Defendant Brinker International, Inc. (“Brinker”). Brinker is a holding company whose subsidiaries operate a number of concept restaurants, including Romano’s Macaroni Grill and Chili’s, which are located throughout the country. 1 Mr.…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marcus A. Noble v. Brinker International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Blankerts v. v. Gladieux EnterprisesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
- Moskowitz v. Progressive InsuranceLake County Court of Common Pleas · 2004
- Mahmoud O. Alili v. P.N.C. BankDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026
- Marcus A. Noble v. Brinker International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.