Legal Opinion

City of Long Beach v. Sten

California Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 8499PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying to defendant, William Ellis Lady, attorney’s fees in a condemnation proceeding against his own property, which proceeding had been defended by him in propria persona.

The plaintiff filed this action in 1923 in the superior court in and for the county of Los Angeles to condemn certain property in the city of Long Beach, jointly owned by the defendants Sten and Lady. The latter is an attorney at law and appeared and defended on behalf of his co-owner and for himself, personally. An interlocutory judgment in the sum of $19,620 was obtained in their favor,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Patterson v. DonnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. City of Long Beach v. O'DonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Winer v. Jonal CorporationMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. O'CONNELL v. ZimmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Leaf v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API