Legal Opinion

Rezos v. Zahm & Nagel Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 19, 1926No. Docket No. 5062PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P.J.

Action to recover a commission amounting to the sum of $337.50 upon an alleged express agreement for the sale of a certain evaporator or grape-juice concentrator.

Defendant was the manufacturer of the machine and plaintiff claimed to be its agent in consummating the sale in question. The trial court so found and judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff in the sum prayed for, together with costs. The main ground relied upon for a reversal is that the evidence shows conclusively that plaintiff was acting as the agent of the buyer, for which reason he could not also be the agent of the seller.

T…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pacific Vinegar & Pickle Works v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Gordon v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Wilson v. Southern Pacific Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Housewright v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Kinert v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Zalk v. General Exploration Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Nizuk v. GorgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API