Wilson v. Southern Pacific Land Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of nonsuit of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Dana R. Weller, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
GOSBEY, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit in an action for thé rescission of three separate executory contracts for the sale of real property from the respondent to the appellant. Each contract is the subject of a separate count in the amended complaint. A fourth count was added, being a common count for money had and received.
The plaintiff sought to have said contracts rescinded because of some alleged fraudulent transaction on the part of the person, who, he alleges, was representing him in negotiating for the purchase of the land described in the amended complaint.
Two…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Capitol Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
- Yeiser v. United States Board & Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
- Louisville Trust Co. v. Louisville, N. A. & C. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Wilson v. PaulyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Oakland v. California Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Rezos v. Zahm & Nagel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Fitzgerald v. Union Central Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Wilson v. Southern Pacific Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923